What we still need to decide, honestly.

Is the founder's full name Ian Floyd or Floyd Burry?

The business plan says Ian Floyd (Leasing Director, Bushburg). One strategy doc says Floyd Burry. Must be confirmed before any client-facing string.

Who holds final approval for brand, product, budget, and launch — and who else must sign off (Stay Brooklyn, Bushburg, Rockrose, legal counsel)?

Is there a Bushburg conflict-of-interest, permission, or restriction issue with Floyd launching CityMatch while serving as Bushburg's Leasing Director?

Flagged 'open and high priority' after the Zoom; not answered.

Which buildings are confirmed for launch, who approved access, and what proof exists (signed agreements, emails, owner approval, broker authorization)?

Floyd expects 1,000+ units across ~10 buildings; ambition is strong, proof of launch rights is not yet on file.

What is the current active vacancy, unit mix, asking rents, concession status, and monthly absorption per launch building?

1,000+ total units is not the same as live marketable inventory.

Is CityMatch's building access exclusive, preferred, or non-exclusive — and can The Brook (Greystar pipeline) be named externally?

What columns does the live listing spreadsheet contain, who updates it, and what is the source of truth for rent, availability, concessions, floor plans, unit type, move-in date, media and approval status?

Floyd maintains a spreadsheet updated 2–6× daily as units rent. The site's data layer anticipates a spreadsheet-fed sync.

How quickly must CityMatch reflect inventory changes, what can go wrong, and what error-handling/audit trail is required?

Are swipe cards unit-specific or representative (5–10 best units per building)?

Floyd plans to shoot only the best units per building; amenity content carries the rest.

What exactly must a renter be able to do on day one — and what is deliberately excluded until later?

Floyd said 'just the basic' listings. This build assumes: filter, swipe, save, compare, attach/view tours, qualify, book, message. Acceptance criteria remain unwritten.

What evidence must Phase 1 produce before the native app, paid media, or public launch (qualified users, bookings, showings, signed leases, CAC, conversion)?

What is the non-swipe browsing/comparison path (accessibility, desktop power-users, returning renters)?

This build ships deck buttons + a shortlist grid; a full browse/search view is unscoped.

Will launch cards be 15–30s film walkthroughs (per the business plan) and who produces/approves them?

This build uses client building photography; video-led cards are the stated direction.

Will the product need programmatic tour control (camera moves, deep-links, events) — i.e. a paid, domain-allowlisted Matterport SDK license — or is the free iframe lane enough?

This build uses the free iframe embed (play=1&qs=1), which needs no key.

Which Matterport links, floor plans, and video assets exist per building, and who delivers them?

Questionnaire Q02 — only the first building's assets are confirmed.

Is qualification self-attested, document-verified, or staged — and what happens when someone doesn't qualify for the unit they want?

This build implements the business plan's self-attested gate: 40× rent income, 650+ credit, employed, clean history — at booking attempt, not onboarding.

What exactly does RELO handle (lease issuance, credit checks, paperwork upload, building handoff) and what is the integration contract?

What consent, retention, and access rules govern qualification data?

What is the current manual lead-to-lease workflow (Philippines VA) and the target AI-supported workflow (texting, booking into three agents' calendars, CRM/RELO handoff)?

What must be consistent in every showing (standards, fair-housing training, follow-up timing, quality measurement)?

Not answered in the Zoom.

What manual fallback keeps bookings and agent workflows running if the AI or MVP systems fail?

What is the legal brokerage structure: broker of record, landlord/tenant representation per transaction, and the Stay Brooklyn wrapper agreement status?

Has a NY real-estate attorney reviewed the owner-paid commission model, FARE Act posture, broker disclosures, and advertising compliance?

The FARE Act (June 2025) structurally favors the owner-paid model but requires precise disclosure language. The site footer carries a 'pending legal review' note by design.

What fair-housing safeguards apply to filters, qualification, ranking/recommendation logic, ad targeting, agent scripts, and copy?

Soft-ranking (never filtering) the deck was chosen partly with this in mind, but a proper review is unperformed.

What evidence supports 40 leases/month from a cold start, 1 lease per 4 showings, and $600–$900 CAC?

Flagged as the highest-risk unvalidated assumptions in the partnership analysis.

What budget is needed before first meaningful launch — technology, content, legal, insurance, CRM, brokerage ops, agents, working capital — and who funds which parts?

Which 5–10 positive and 5–10 negative references will Floyd send for look, navigation, buttons, motion, tone, and property presentation?

Does an editable logo master exist (current SVGs are bitmap traces), and should an ivory inverse be properly exported?

What proof points move CityMatch from beta/word-of-mouth to public launch — and what are the beta and public launch dates?

Floyd accepts a 3–6 month delay; 'there is only one real public launch opportunity.'

What data security, privacy, retention, and access-control policy applies to qualification data, messages, bookings, and behavioral/swipe data — and what may the AI agents see or do?

Business plan commits to NY SHIELD Act posture (TLS 1.3, encryption at rest, audit logging).

What should the first version deliberately NOT collect until necessary?

Who owns citymatch.com, newly purchased domains, source code, product IP, social/ad/analytics accounts, user data, and the content library?

Direct conflict on record: AM 'already purchased a domain and started front-end work' vs 'Floyd owns citymatch.com.'

Is Siento/Amigo work-for-hire, shared IP, or AM-licensed IP with royalty?

Which collaboration shape for phase one: paid sprint, reduced-fee build with upside, revenue share, strategic partnership, staged hybrid, or co-owner conversation later?

Floyd wants a long-term relationship; structure intentionally left open after the Zoom.

What is the real Phase-1 booking/agent backend (Cal.com? CRM? Amigo) that 'requested' showings should land in?

Prototype booking slots are demo strings and agent replies are canned acks; this build mirrors that honestly.